Guilty, guilty, guilty. Yes, I’m guilty, and here, in the privacy of Spinetingler, I will confess to it.
Sometimes I read the end of a mystery first.
Okay, not completely first. I’ll read the first chapter, and then, power ahead and read the end. (Don’t groan! Don’t hiss at me and click to another article. Listen. It’s for a reason. And I do go back and read the whole book.)
Before I started writing mysteries, I didn’t read the end first. In the time before PRIME TIME, I read mysteries and thrillers and suspense just the way authors hoped I would. Starting at the beginning, in a really good book turning the pages as fast as I could, and then getting to the end at, well, the end. And that method of reading, time honored, was completely successful.
Then (at age 55, so all of you who are wanting to write but thinking: it’s too late for me—well, it’s not) I started writing PRIME TIME. I had no idea what I was doing, so I powered along, happily typing and churning out pages. Outline? NO way, la dee dah, I was a pantser before I even know what a pantser was. Writing by the seat of my pants. But I figured I knew the story, and who got killed, and how, and who the bad guy was, and certainly, as a result, the ending. I absolutely knew where this book was going.
So one night, late, lying in bed, I was, of course, thinking about the book. I was about half-way through PRIME TIME, maybe forty thousand words. And I had been dipping into a how-to book by G. Miki Hayden. In it, she suggests an exercise where you try out each character as the villain. The point, she said, was to get a deeper view of your characters’ relationships with each other. That made sense to me, and seemed like a fun idea to try.
On the other hand, it also seemed like a waste of time, because I knew who my bad guy was.
But, sleepless in Boston, I gave it a shot. “Person A as the bad guy,” I mused. No, that wouldn’t work. Person B as the bad guy. Hmm. Nope, that wouldn’t work. Person C as the bad guy—nope, that wouldn’t—wait.
Wait. A. Minute.
My brain started racing, careening through my manuscript, checking chapters and mentally turning the pages as fast as I could. Had I—chosen the wrong bad guy? Had I—written half book thinking I knew whodunit—and was I wrong?
I couldn’t believe it. I tried to talk myself out of it (luckily my husband was asleep) but the reality was staring me in the face.
I had chosen the wrong bad guy. It was all I could do not to run down to the study and bang open the computer and pull up the half-done manuscript and check.
The next morning, I realized I was right. To change the ending to the new (and real) villain, all I had to do was change—ah, maybe four of the thousands of words I had already written. The bad guy was already there, lurking in the pages, guilty. I just hadn’t noticed it. And I wrote the thing!
Talk about a surprise ending. I had surprised myself!
And that got me thinking about endings. How, in a well-written mystery or thriller, something about the ending is right there in the beginning. It has to be. That the book is a cohesive whole, every little individual word of it creating the big picture. And when the author brings you to a terrific original unique ending, it makes the whole book work. The puzzle pieces rearrange, right? And you say; oh, now I see what the author was doing!
Shutter Island. Murder on the Orient Express. The Sixth Sense. Whether you like them or not, knowing the ending would make you read the book or see the movie in a different way, right? You would see the clues, you would see the foreshadowing, you would understand what techniques the authors used to fool the reader and how they lure the reader into believing one way–when reality is another. How they play fair—or how they don’t.
Knowing the ending, and reading “for” it, is a wonderful learning experience for me. It lets me reverse- engineer the story and the writing, and understand all the techniques that come into play.
And frankly, it allows me to take more time to enjoy it. When I was reading the new Think of A Number, I realized I was turning pages so quickly to find the secret, I wasn’t really “reading” the words. So—another confession—I asked my husband to just tell me what happened.
I’m not telling you what happened, he said, astonished. That would spoil the whole thing!
No, I said. Not knowing is spoiling it.
So he told me. And it was good. And then I read it, more slowly and even more appreciatively, because I knew what was coming.
And that is why, fellow readers and authors forgive me, I sometimes flip to the end. And then start at the beginning. Yes, I am guilty. Are you, too?
Leave your comment and you’re automatically entered in a draw to win a free copy of one of Hank’s books!
Award-winning investigative reporter Hank Phillippi Ryan is on the air at Boston’s NBC affiliate. Her work has resulted in new laws, people sent to prison, homes removed from foreclosure, and millions of dollars in restitution. Along with her 26 EMMYs, Hank’s won dozens of other journalism honors. She’s been a radio reporter, a legislative aide in the United States Senate and an editorial assistant at Rolling Stone Magazine working with Hunter S. Thompson.
Her first mystery, the best-selling PRIME TIME, won the Agatha for Best First Novel. It was also was a double RITA nominee for Best First Book and Best Romantic Suspense Novel, and a Reviewers’ Choice Award Winner. FACE TIME and AIR TIME are IMBA bestsellers, and AIR TIME was nominated for the AGATHA Award for Best Novel of 2009 and is now an Anthony Nominee for Best Paperback Original.. (Of AIR TIME, Sue Grafton says: “This is first-class entertainment.”) DRIVE TIME, (MIRA/February 2010) just earned a starred review from Library Journal saying it “puts Ryan in a league with Lisa Scottoline.”
Hank’s short story “On The House” won the AGATHA for Best Short Story of 2009, and is now an Anthony nominee and a Macavity nominee.
Hank is on the national board of Mystery Writers of America.
Hank Phillippi Ryan
PRIME TIME *Agatha Winner*
FACE TIME IMBA Bestseller
AIR TIME *2009 Agatha nominee* *2009 Anthony Nominee*
DRIVE TIME Feb. 2010
“On the House *2009 Agatha WINNER* Best Short Story *2009 Anthony and Macavity Nominee*
Authors who would like to contribute an article to Spinetingler Magazine should email spinetinglermag @ gmail . com and address their query to Sandra Ruttan.


Once in a while I WILL flip to the end but for the most part I am able to control myself. The temptation, though, is so, so strong!
Hank, how interesting and how inspiring!
I’m a linear reader and never read the end first, although I do go back once I’ve finished to see just exactly how the author cooked up a wham-bam ending.
I don’t read the end of mysteries. But the mystery I just finished writing went through four drafts before I figured out who-dun-it! So, Hank, I know what you mean about choosing the wrong villain.
In my WIP, I didn’t even get my victim right in the first draft! It was NaNoWriMo–my only excuse!
Kathleen and Gloria, it’s fun to know you do it, too. And it’s not really..cheating…is it? Because who’s to say what the rules are. We read for different reasons, and WE get to choose!
Terry, thank you thank you! It’s incredbly rewarding to think about you reading my books–hard to explain, but I envision you, in Ketchikan, holding AIR TIME or something ,and reading what I wrote, and enjoying it–and it’s just the most wonderful experience for me. Thank you!
It’s such a treat to read your comments! Hi Sheila, Hi Brenda, Hi Norma..whoa.I hope our paths cross in person soon. Sarah–NaNoWriMo–good for you! Towse–Sal, is that you?
Shane! I just saw your comment..thanks! Can’t wait to read Torn Apart..and see what you decided. Or I guess–who the bad guy decided to be. (ANd I promise I won’t read the end first. Maybe.)
Rhys, you say you couldn’t have skipped to the end on Murder on the Orient Express–but you didn’t know you felt that way until you got there and knew what happened. YOu COULD have..and think how differently you would have read the book! I agree, that’s a great ending. From the beginning–or from the end!
Shirley..you’re a very careful reader, how wonderful! And Patricia, to save yourself from bad dreams? What a fascinating thing to realize.
KAthy, control issues? YOU? And yeah, if I’m worrying someone I’m rooting for is going to die, it just makes the book too tense. I’ve gotta know.
Lovely to see you here…xoxo
Hi, Hank. Yes, ’tis I. — Sal
I never read the end before I get to it. I have read some books that I already had heard about the ending from someone else. If it’s a great read and good characters then it doesn’t stop me from reading it. Can’t wait for your next one!
Oh my gosh! This post resonated with me–I don’t skip to the end, but if I’m truly hooked, I read so fast to find the solution to the puzzle that I miss details. And then I go back and read it again, slowly and carefully. Now I need to take a closer look at my own work and see if, perhaps, I’ve chosen the wrong villain. Thanks for this article!